T-Mobile and Sprint win antitrust suit, paving road to merger

(Reuters) — A federal judge on Tuesday approved a merger between number 3 and 4 wireless carriers T-Mobile and Sprint, rejecting a claim by a group of states that said the deal would violate antitrust laws and raise prices.

During a two-week trial in December, T-Mobile and Sprint argued the merger will better equip the new company to compete with top players Verizon and AT&T, creating a more efficient company with low prices and faster internet speeds.

Shares of T-Mobile rose 9% to $92.51 in premarket trading while shares of Sprint soared almost 70% to $8.22.

The states, led by California and New York, had said the deal would reduce competition, leading to higher prices.

The decision by U.S. District Court Judge Victor Marrero clears the path for the deal, which already has federal approval and was originally valued at $26 billion.

Diana Moss, president of the pro-enforcement American Antitrust Institute, said the states should consider an appeal.

“State enforcement is critically important for competition and consumers, particularly under an administration where federal enforcers allow harmful mergers to proceed, often with ineffective remedies, she said.

The U.S. Justice Department approved the deal in July after the carriers agreed to sell some prepaid assets to satellite provider Dish Network, which would create its own cellular network to ensure that there would still be four competitors in the market. The Federal Communications Commission signed off on the deal in October.

The states maintained that Dish was ill-equipped to become a competitive fourth wireless carrier, noting that it lacks experience, scale and brand recognition in wireless.

Uniting T-Mobile’s low-band spectrum and Sprint’s mid-band spectrum could allow a fast rollout of a national 5G network. Japan’s Softbank is Sprint’s controlling shareholder.

Source: Read Full Article